Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:25:09 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>, Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r374469 - head/graphics/jpeg Message-ID: <548881F5.6030103@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20141210170012.445bafd6@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201412101530.sBAFUYP3047048@svn.freebsd.org> <20141210170012.445bafd6@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/10/2014 17:00, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> Author: dinoex >> Date: Wed Dec 10 15:30:33 2014 >> New Revision: 374469 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/374469 >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r374469/ >> >> Log: >> - update to jpeg9 >> >> Modified: >> head/graphics/jpeg/Makefile >> head/graphics/jpeg/distinfo >> head/graphics/jpeg/pkg-plist >> > > This probably needs an exp-run and a lot of PORTREVISION bumps. > Is this change going to be reverted? I was right at the point to start a new generation of dports when all these massive changes game. From the text above, I'd expect the change to be reverted with an EPOCH bump. Is that going to happen or ... ? (It figures that I wanted until Perl fallout subsided only to get hit by this...) John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?548881F5.6030103>