Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:33:29 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Cc: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>, hackers@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: make question Message-ID: <19A0E2B5-54A9-4929-A4DB-3E0DCC251DFA@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimro2n5fiOT%2BzcEHe73WZuqPdiQ=g@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110427193946.GA41659@freebsd.org> <20110428174523.I61666@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <BANLkTimro2n5fiOT%2BzcEHe73WZuqPdiQ=g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 28, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hartmut Brandt = <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> wrote: >> I think we can change this, because it would break makefiles that = assume >> that the entire script is given to the shell in one piece. >>=20 > I'm not sure to parse that. "We can change it because it would break = stuff". >=20 > That said, if something was to be broken, it would already shows up > when using "-j N", and thus should be considered as a bug. There's bugs in the code which does the output which makes it wrong = often... So there's bugs both ways... There's archival history here in = hackers@. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19A0E2B5-54A9-4929-A4DB-3E0DCC251DFA>