Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:33:51 -0500 (EST)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        standards@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   standards/46035: pathchk doesn't understand the new meaning of {PATH_MAX}
Message-ID:  <200212061833.gB6IXp31062861@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200212061823.gB6INMg5062746@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
References:  <200212061823.gB6INMg5062746@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:23:22 -0500 (EST), Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> said:

> 	pathchk was never updated for the change in {PATH_MAX}
> 	semantics made by 1003.1-2001.  {PATH_MAX} (and thus,
> 	{_POSIX_PATH_MAX}) now include the trailing null character.
> 	Thus, pathchk is off by one.
	
The manual page also needs to be updated.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200212061833.gB6IXp31062861>