Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:42:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Ed Maste <emaste@phaedrus.sandvine.ca> Subject: Re: inet_pton and oddly-formatted addresses Message-ID: <20070120214052.U82671@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <yged559v3y8.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <20070120192807.GA1326@sandvine.com> <yged559v3y8.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:28:07 -0500 >>>>>> Ed Maste <emaste@phaedrus.sandvine.ca> said: > > emaste> I think an address like 1.002.3.4 is bizarre, but is our inet_pton incorrect > emaste> in rejecting it? > > The change was taken from BIND9. The following is from BIND9's > CHANGES: > > 935. [bug] inet_pton failed to reject leading zeros. well, maybe they were wrong? How does one get in contact with their bugs database these days? Is comp.protocols.dns.bind still a good place to discuss these things? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070120214052.U82671>