Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:22:04 -0700 From: Scott Blachowicz <scott@sabami.seaslug.org> To: Scott Blachowicz <scott@mail.dsab.rresearch.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/36307: nmh port cuts off last part of sender domain Message-ID: <20020421032205.026BB1DC5@mail.dsab.rresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <200204072050.g37Ko2L77641@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200204072050.g37Ko2L77641@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So...is there a standard process for getting ports changes committed to the ports tree? It seems like with most of the changes I've submitted before, I'd managed to catch the interest of a committer - apparently not so this time. Does it make any sense to have individual port maintainers have commit access just for the ports they maintain? Or is that too much of an administrative/security/whatever headache? Scott Scott Blachowicz <scott@mail.dsab.rresearch.com> wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/36307; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Scott Blachowicz <scott@sabami.seaslug.org> > To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/36307: nmh port cuts off last part of sender domain > Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 13:41:24 -0700 > > --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > It occurs to me that this should probably be sent to the gnats-submit address > instead of just to freebsd-ports, so here it is. > > I need to get someone to commit this. > > Thanx, > -- > Scott Blachowicz > > ...patch removed from this followup... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020421032205.026BB1DC5>