Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:05:50 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: bmah@FreeBSD.org Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING Message-ID: <20020421.000550.21910374.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <200204210343.g3L3hrDp009659@intruder.bmah.org> References: <200204210328.g3L3Sg534129@freefall.freebsd.org> <200204210343.g3L3hrDp009659@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200204210343.g3L3hrDp009659@intruder.bmah.org>
"Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: If memory serves me right, Doug Barton wrote:
: > dougb 2002/04/20 20:28:42 PDT
: >
: > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4)
: > . UPDATING
: > Log:
: > Add a note about the /etc MFC
:
: (I'm still opposed to the inetd change, but if it's going to stay in, I
: want to make sure we do it right...)
:
: I know you're trying to get people to deal with /etc/defaults/rc.conf
: changes in general, and not just this specific instance. However, I
: think we also need to mention inetd(8) specifically in the UPDATING and
: HEADSUP, since that seems to be the thing that people are tripping over
: the most. What say you?
The Security Team promised that we wouldn't make this change in
-stable, and I still think we should *NOT* MFC it. The "it is too
hard to keep things different" pain is smaller than the pain we're
going to cause ourselves when 4.6 comes out. I'm opposed to this
change and really want to see it backed out. I don't have the SO hat
any more, but if I did, I'd be wearing it for this message.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020421.000550.21910374.imp>