Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:46:40 -0800 From: ray@redshift.com To: Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com> Cc: ogreve@millennics.com, amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4 or 6 for DB server with 9500S-4 ? Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20051125114640.00a5d2f8@pop.redshift.com> In-Reply-To: <43871B20.3050007@wmptl.com> References: <3.0.1.32.20051125041044.00a47720@pop.redshift.com> <3.0.1.32.20051121055411.00aa1490@pop.redshift.com> <20051119200222.V2029@roble.com> <20051119120051.39BE216A41F@hub.freebsd.org> <20051119200222.V2029@roble.com> <3.0.1.32.20051121055411.00aa1490@pop.redshift.com> <3.0.1.32.20051125041044.00a47720@pop.redshift.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| I disagree. First-off, 6.0-RELEASE may be new to the block, but 6.0 has been | kicking it almost as long as 5.4-RELEASE has been out. Most of the experiences | I've heard back from other users are saying 6.0, even RC-1 before -RELEASE | actually runs better than 5.4-RELEASE. Certain key optimizations in 6.0 will Speaking of First-off: That original message was a private message to me and you from Olaf asking for our opinions on FreeBSD, etc. and it was replied to as such (privately) - in my opinion it's very poor form to suddenly cc everything we are discussing off the list back to the FreeBSD without so much as asking. If you want to start a thread about is FreeBSD 5.4 or 6.0 better for production, that's great. But don't use my private messages to people seeking help to do it. Ray
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.20051125114640.00a5d2f8>