Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:11:31 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/i387 fenv.c fenv.h Message-ID: <20050318081131.GA80612@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <423A89B9.1040601@samsco.org> References: <20050318055212.GA70385@FreeBSD.org> <20050318061647.GA40922@VARK.MIT.EDU> <423A7277.1000202@samsco.org> <20050317.233645.74714466.imp@bsdimp.com> <423A89B9.1040601@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:56:41AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Warner Losh wrote: > >>You had better bump the version number for libm before 6.0 rolls > >>around!! I've just found a 3rd party binary-only package that > >>supports 'FreeBSD 5.x' but is linked against libm.so.2. Ugh. We > >>need to bury that mistake and NOT make it again. > > > > > >6.0 already has /lib/libm.so.3 > > > >Warner > > No, 5.3 has libm.so.3. 6.0-RELEASE had better have libm.so.4 Well, if David finds enought reasons (after this discussion) to bump so version number, I think it's still better to go off with cleaner and "less-hacky" code. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050318081131.GA80612>