Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" <martymac@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r316102 - in head/emulators/dolphin-emu-devel: . files Message-ID: <20130419150333.M65185@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130419134935.GA29457@FreeBSD.org> References: <201304191335.r3JDZF4B031649@svn.freebsd.org> <20130419134935.GA29457@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:49:35 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote Hi Alexey, > I would say this is rather bogus BROKEN message: it's totally > unclear what exactly "i386-specific option" is: assembler > instruction, compiler option, or something else. This is an old one that has been re-ordered, see : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu-devel/Makefile.diff?r1=1.2;r2=1.3 and to be honest, I am not sure whether Dolphin is still BROKEN or not on PowerPC, as it should now be buildable on (e.g.) Android devices too. > This is not only bad because perhaps NOT_FOR_ARCHS might suit > better in this case, but also because it does not encourage > some brave soul who might pass by this port to attempt to fix > it. Vague hints tend to give these "oh well, maybe later" feelings. To encourage people to test the port on other archs, maybe something like : ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON= Has only been tested on i386 and amd64 would be more explicit ? Best regards, -- Ganael LAPLANCHE <ganael.laplanche@martymac.org> http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org FreeBSD: martymac <martymac@FreeBSD.org>, http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130419150333.M65185>