Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:45:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@webwarrior.net> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/20028 ASCII docs should reflect <emphasis> tags Message-ID: <20020819214526.GB3837@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <1029168527.229.27.camel@heater.vladsempire.net> References: <1029168527.229.27.camel@heater.vladsempire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On 2002-08-12 16:08 +0000, Josh Paetzel wrote: > I'm willing to take a shot at tackling this, assuming it's a real > problem that really needs fixing. It would also be nice to have some > input as to what a good ASCII emphasis tag would be. The author of the > pr suggests *this is emphasized*. Is that acceptable or is this subject > to discussion/debate/flamages? :) <imho> This style of emphasizing looks okay. There will probably be problems when one tries to emphasize a single `*' character, as in: <emphasis>*</emphasis> but this should not stop you from trying to make the ASCII docs look better. First we need something that works, then we can refine it if/when such problems appear. Giorgos --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9YWb11g+UGjGGA7YRArXFAJ4yNeFHmoJCM123cJfS/SnURJTV8wCghPyV tmGIPMpsZykaBW5c5hZ6rv4= =fQxF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020819214526.GB3837>