Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:31:33 +0300
From:      Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1@outlook.com>
To:        "freebsd-chat@freebsd.org" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
Message-ID:  <COL127-W5DF5F825DDBDDA7556623E87F0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <COL127-W4961547B486570D01FA0EBE87F0@phx.gbl>
References:  <COL127-W4961547B486570D01FA0EBE87F0@phx.gbl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> From: jorgeassembler1@outlook.com
> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
> Date: Wed=2C 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300
>=20
> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD and m=
any other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD developers take g=
reat pride in the system man pages. The man pages are the authoritative sou=
rce of OpenBSD documentation -- not this FAQ=2C not third-party independent=
ly maintained pages=2C not "HOWTO"s=2C etc. "
> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?=20
>  		 	   		 =20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
> To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

because no one responds? 		 	   		  =



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?COL127-W5DF5F825DDBDDA7556623E87F0>