Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:02:30 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Q <q_dolan@yahoo.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD Message-ID: <20031023130230.GA2916@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <1066910120.58538.15.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> References: <20031022082953.GA69506@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022095754.GA70026@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022144043.GI55642@dan.emsphone.com> <20031022155058.GE3640@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20031022204200.GC14012@splashground.de> <1066865808.42673.28.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031023112353.GD14012@splashground.de> <1066910120.58538.15.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:55:21PM +1000, Q wrote: > I beg to differ. It might show linear growth, but the OpenBSD graph is > definitely not O(n). Err... How would you define O(n) then ? Zlo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031023130230.GA2916>