Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:56:26 +1030 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Munehiro Matsuda <haro@kgt.co.jp> Cc: c.rued@xsb.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jdk13 and WITH_NATIVE_THREADS compile failing Message-ID: <20030221205625.A28043@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20030221.100406.41628347.haro@kgt.co.jp>; from haro@kgt.co.jp on Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:04:06AM %2B0900 References: <15956.19601.491644.845972@ool-18bacefa.dyn.optonline.net> <20030220.152353.104026134.haro@kgt.co.jp> <15957.11931.949338.673306@ool-18bacefa.dyn.optonline.net> <20030221.100406.41628347.haro@kgt.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:04:06AM +0900, Munehiro Matsuda wrote: > Hello Chris, > > From: Christopher Rued <c.rued@xsb.com> > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:38:03 -0500 > :: > ::# /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/bin/java -version > :: > ::java version "1.3.1-p8" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1-p8-cbr-030219-12:02) Classic VM (build 1.3.1-p8-cbr-030219-12:02, green threads, nojit) > :: > > :: > Ok, which means green thread part of JDK is working. > :: > How about doing the following command? > :: > > :: > # java -native -version > :: > > :: > If this works, then native thread part of JDK is also working. > :: > Then that should tell us, whether only hotspot VM part is broken or > :: > not. > :: > ::OK...native threads seem to work: > :: > ::# java -version > ::java version "1.3.1-p8" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1-p8-cbr-030219-12:02) > ::Classic VM (build 1.3.1-p8-cbr-030219-12:02, native threads, nojit) > > Ok, it seems that Hotspot was broken then. > > :: > BTW, your were the only one who had the corrupted patch with '^M's. > :: > I'll send you the original patch in private, so could you retry building > :: > your JDK with it? > :: > :: > ::Sure thing. I'll try applying the patch that you sent to me, and see > ::if that changes anything. > :: > ::Something that someone (I forget who) on this mailing list said is > ::also causing me to wonder about another issue: My FreeBSD source tree > ::(under /usr/src) is not in sync with my compiled system; it's about > ::two weeks newer. I was under the impression that the source under > ::/usr/src was never used by any ports (just /usr/include, > ::/usr/X11R6/include, etc). Should I be worried about my source in > ::/usr/src being out of sync with my system? Is the source under > ::/usr/src used in the build? > > The only file FreeBSD's JDK patchset tries include from the /usr/src > is the pthread_private.h file, I think. > It is not installed by default, so /usr/src becomes a must have. That is correct. Previously the pthread library didn't support the entire API required by HotSpot (and native threads) so we needed to access the private data. This is bad and hopefully we can remove that requirement. > May be we should, > 1) change the /usr/src Makefiles to install pthread_private.h to > /usr/include/sys or somewhere appropriate > 2) change jdk13 port's Makefile to check the existance for > pthread_private.h under /usr/include/sys > 3) if not found, then apply a patch, to make compile process to use > the pthread_pricate.h from /usr/src I think it is better if we look at what we need to do to remove the necessity of using pthread_private.h. I think we can do that now, although it will require a recent -STABLE. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030221205625.A28043>