Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 20:17:55 -0700 From: Dima Ruban <dima@rdy.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pccard Makefile.inc Message-ID: <20010402201755.A6698@sivka.rdy.com> In-Reply-To: <20010403110240.C71213@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@lemis.com on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:02:40AM %2B0930 References: <200104020847.f328lPi25772@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104022033340.23902-100000@besplex.bde.org> <20010403095930.A39626@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010402180621.A6429@sivka.rdy.com> <20010403110240.C71213@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:02:40AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > >> > >> That depends on your partition layout. > > > > How is that? Both pccardd and pccardc are in /usr/sbin/ directory, > > shared libraries are in /usr/lib directory. I can see a brain damaged > > filesystem layout where /usr/sbin is actually part of / filesystem and > > /usr/lib is a different filesystem, but following this logic we'll have to > > compile everything static just to support configurations like that. > > I don't think it's very smart. > > There's nothing brain-damaged about having /usr on the root file > system. If it weren't for bikeshed issues, I'd recommend it. No, there's nothing wrong with having /usr on the root filesystem. But having /usr on a root filesystem _and_ /usr/lib as a separate filesystem is definitely brain-damaged. > > Greg > -- > Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key > See complete headers for address and phone numbers -- dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010402201755.A6698>