Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:13:06 -0400 From: "J. Hellenthal" <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: wxs@freebsd.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status cleanup Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103291705150.3620@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny> In-Reply-To: <4D92444B.9010106@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110319012959.GA39929@atarininja.org> <20110319013155.GB39929@atarininja.org> <20110329024441.GA24720@atarininja.org> <20110329.115900.969026047405273902.hrs@allbsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103291613570.3620@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny> <4D92444B.9010106@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:42, dougb@ wrote: > On 03/29/2011 13:32, J. Hellenthal wrote: >> As for the status command in ip6addrctl Is it really needed ? > > Yes, it prints out the current table. > Yes. I realize that. Being that their is no consumers calling status for ip6addrctl is mainly my point in that it is not needed. I just do not see a point in status for non-daemon rcng scripts. -- Regards, J. Hellenthal (0x89D8547E) JJH48-ARIN
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1103291705150.3620>