Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:12:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Leftwich <Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com> To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> Cc: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu>, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, Jeff Jirsa <jeff@unixconsults.com>, John Bleichert <syborg@stny.rr.com>, FreeBSD LIST <FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.Org> Subject: Re: Links (was: Is simplicity despised? WAS: Message-ID: <20020808211101.G85736-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> In-Reply-To: <20020808141523.GT281@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > No, less is not hardlinked to more, nor is more hardlinked to less. > They're two names for the same file. > > So... Yes, you're right: less is really more. But at the same time, > more is less. This thread leaves one craving simplicity -- anyway, a question. So can you delete one and not have both disappear? I think it would be very quirky and perhaps rude of FreeBSD if a user did an `rm more` and less went with it! -- Peter Leftwich President & Founder Video2Video Services Box 13692, La Jolla, CA, 92039 USA +1-413-403-9555 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020808211101.G85736-100000>