Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:17:37 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Ganael LAPLANCHE <martymac@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r316102 - in head/emulators/dolphin-emu-devel: . files Message-ID: <20130420051737.GA23612@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgme6zpAs9gB3oNcoNupFVSMRYTAoZxhbJPkNHD3gKEH1A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201304191335.r3JDZF4B031649@svn.freebsd.org> <20130419134935.GA29457@FreeBSD.org> <20130419150333.M65185@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgme6zpAs9gB3oNcoNupFVSMRYTAoZxhbJPkNHD3gKEH1A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:49:45PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 19 April 2013 11:15, Ganael LAPLANCHE <martymac@freebsd.org> wrote: > > To encourage people to test the port on other archs, maybe something like : > > > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON= Has only been tested on i386 and amd64 > > > > would be more explicit ? > > No. > > ONLY_FOR_* means that the port is *never intended* to work on any > other platform. BROKEN ports are, in theory, periodically tested. Exactly. I only mentioned ONLY_FOR_ARCHS to illustrate that "i386-specific option" is overly vague even to tell BROKEN from ONLY_FOR_ARCHS, which are very different beasts, and should not be confused. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130420051737.GA23612>