Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:31:47 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Subject: Re: ports/144502: mail/spamd port insists on fdescfs mount Message-ID: <4B940D33.7040004@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4B93FBD2.8060903@gmx.de> References: <201003071750.o27Ho2SW027882@freefall.freebsd.org> <4B93F758.2020508@infracaninophile.co.uk> <86y6i4t0ql.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <4B93FBD2.8060903@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2010 19:17:38, olli hauer wrote:
> Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
>>>>>>> writes:
>>
>> Matthew> Anyhow, if STD{IN,OUT,ERR} is sufficient for obspamd then the
>> test in
>> Matthew> the init script could be reduced to
>>
>> Matthew> if [ -c /dev/fd/0 ] ; then
>>
>> Matthew> Otherwise, testing for fdescfs is correct.
>>
>> I don't know whether fd's higher than 2 are required. So maybe the
>> description and instructions should be left as is for now.
>>
>
> Yes, fd's higher than 2 are required.
>
> I implemented the check for fdescfs with this thread in mind.
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2006-November/002744.html
This should help prevent this sort of confusion in future:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144534
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuUDTMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzOygCfYx0vPV5r84OvnjzhgEOzhxzu
tWAAnjHUMlIYPi8bXcgZFDtT80AzlqcH
=xigG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B940D33.7040004>