Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 12:55:57 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: David O'Brien <dev-null@NUXI.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <20030506175557.GE79167@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030506170919.GD36798@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305011046140.73226-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <XFMail.20030501140549.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org> <20030503201409.GA41554@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030505175428.GA19275@madman.celabo.org> <20030506170919.GD36798@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 10:09:19AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 12:54:28PM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > > > I'm backing out the commit in good faith and in the hopes that the > > > > big picture comes more clearly into focus. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Do you also want to `fix' the other ports that define their own strlcpy? > > Ports have maintainers. Please create a PR for them. But gee, the problem is that the ports themselves are not really in error, unless one is a standards fascist that believes that an application can never define any function that might be in some standard's namespace. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030506175557.GE79167>