Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:47:24 +0100 From: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca>, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/176201: [net80211] [patch] 11n station includes unrelated ht params into ASSOC_REQ packet Message-ID: <201302221947.24307.bschmidt@techwires.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmom9sE0dMXCp2Tn=DUFTGhgpH%2BW2uDHpv5VeDL3%2B3RgJsw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201302180246.r1I2kocv064092@freefall.freebsd.org> <201302221933.25718.bschmidt@techwires.net> <CAJ-Vmom9sE0dMXCp2Tn=DUFTGhgpH%2BW2uDHpv5VeDL3%2B3RgJsw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:34:30 PM Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > Why isn't it a per-node thing for the AP case? > > Ie, what should the AP do if the ampdu density it supports is 0 but > the STA AMPDU density on the RX side is 8? What made you think it isn't? ni_htparams is per-node(ni)? If you kept the original mail it might be easier to figure out what you are refering to. :) If you ment the stuff I wrote about IBSS, well, as I said, IBSS is way to complex for me right to think about.. -- Bernhard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201302221947.24307.bschmidt>