Date: 24 Aug 1998 02:13:23 -0500 From: stephen farrell <stephen@farrell.org> To: vitus@fe.msk.ru Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: catdoc Message-ID: <87ww7y4zu4.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: vitus@fe.msk.ru's message of "Mon, 24 Aug 1998 11:03:34 %2B0400 (MSD)" References: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980824105923.4650A-100000@party.fe.msk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
vitus@fe.msk.ru writes: > On 21 Aug 1998, stephen farrell wrote: > > > > > thanks for making a new version of your catdoc program available! I > > made a "port" for freebsd, and the following patch might be of > > interest to you: > > Thank you for your suggestions. I would incorporate some of them > into alpha 3 release. > > Unfortunately, in alpha 2 version I have to switch from /usr/bin/install > to plain old cp and chmod, becouse I was unable to overcome differences > between installs on BSDI, Solaris and Linux. Hmm... I know autoconf handles this ok, so it must be possible? perhaps just use cp & chmod in the degenerative case? With FreeBSD, there is a variable set up BSD_INSTALL_BINARY, iirc, that is set to install with the correct flags. If you use cp & chmod, then the FreeBSD "port" will surely just change this to BSD_INSTALL_BINARY... (any suggestions from freebsd-ports??) > P.S. What a reason of changing optimization mode from -O2 to -O? > Is there some problems on freeBSD with -O2 compilied version? > On BSDI 3.1 -O2 works. There was no reason, and it was a mistake on my part anyway: With FreeBSD, people like to define CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf so they can control these sorts of things in a global fashion--this is what I should have done, instead of mucking with them. While I have not tested it, I have no reason to think that 02 won't work. -- Steve Farrell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87ww7y4zu4.fsf>