Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:23:47 +0000 From: James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com> To: Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OpenJDK 6/7 kqueue based NIO provider Message-ID: <4B65E6D3.2010809@mansionfamily.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <201001311324.54206.pieter@degoeje.nl> References: <201001301816.16987.pieter@degoeje.nl> <201001301958.59731.pieter@degoeje.nl> <4B654FDA.7070603@mansionfamily.plus.com> <201001311324.54206.pieter@degoeje.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pieter de Goeje wrote: > That is an interesting idea, such an implementation could potentially replace > all existing back-ends with the exception of the Windows IOCP back-end. > However libev doesn't seem to provide a non-blocking poll which is required > for NIO (ev_loop always blocks AFAIK). > I'll ask Marc. Would have thought that it wouldn't be too hard to arrance an immediate timeout or to register a known-available fd too (/dev/null?) James
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B65E6D3.2010809>