Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru> To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[8]: high load system do not take all CPU time Message-ID: <1245989976.20111228223227@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <201112262154.pBQLsxJt038471@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <9110154891.20111226214424@yandex.ru> <201112262154.pBQLsxJt038471@mail.r-bonomi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RB> [drivelectomy -- 200+ lines] RB> You've been told the following, *repeatedly*: RB> Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic RB> it is being subjected to. RB> Reaaltek cards and the 're' device driver are a *BAD*CHOICE* for systems with RB> heavy network traffic. They're merely 'medium lousy' on a lightly-loaded RB> system, but you don't notice the problems under light loads. RB> You have two choices: RB> 1) "live with" the crappy performance RB> 2) get a better quality network card. without only one ipfw fw rule: queue 54 config pipe 54 queue 50 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 275 queue 54 all from any not 80,110 to any in recv re0 works more! better: http://piccy.info/view3/2418620/59aa576c1006bbb046a13554d8468a6c/ with igb cards I get problems too! it put pptp traffice only to one queue0 instead to spread to all: queue0 queue1 queue2 queue3 =`((((( -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1245989976.20111228223227>