Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 May 2003 20:16:58 -0400
From:      Munish Chopra <mchopra@engmail.uwaterloo.ca>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The sysinstall's safe_realloc() failure
Message-ID:  <20030512001658.GA77586@opiate.soulwax.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030511234109.GC66670@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <20030509115517.GF6082@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030509222224L.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <3EBD16E4.1060903@jocose.org> <20030511184329Y.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20030511234109.GC66670@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003-05-11 16:41 +0000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 06:43:29PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> > 
> > peter> This works for me.  Some problem with the lukemftpd I guess.
> > 
> > Hmm, maybe.  However, you know, lukemftpd is *old*; I'm just
> > installing tnftpd 2.0 beta3 to the host (ya ya, it is easy to make
> 
> Since I've already gotten one email about this.. I assume you are talking
> about the ports version, not the /usr/src/contrib/ version.  The
> /usr/src/contrib was last synced with the NetBSD CVS repo on 2003-02-02.
> The date on the tnftpd-2.0-beta3.tar.gz distribution is Feb 2003-02-26.
> The differences between the two are in the "portability" area.  Which
> FreeBSD doesn't need very much as we are also BSD.  One can get the
> /usr/src/contrib version by adding "WANT_LUKEMFTPD=yes" to /etc/make.conf
> 

WANT_LUKEMFTPD is undocumented, it doesn't exist in
/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf or in make.conf(5).

Will that replace the stock ftpd, or just additionally install
lukemftpd?

-- 
Munish Chopra



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030512001658.GA77586>