Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Feb 2001 11:43:22 +0800
From:      "Kathy Quinlan" <katinka@magestower.com>
To:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Fw: Ipfw with dial-up
Message-ID:  <015401c09e13$f0acd640$fe00a8c0@kat.lan>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sorry, just sent to mike and forgot the list ooopppssss.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kathy Quinlan" <katinka@magestower.com>
To: "Mike Meyer" <mwm@mired.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Ipfw with dial-up


> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Meyer" <mwm@mired.org>
> To: "Mikko Tyolajarvi" <mikko@dynas.se>
> Cc: <questions@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 11:03 AM
> Subject: Re: Ipfw with dial-up
> 
> 
> > 
> > Check the natd(8) man page, last sentence of the first paragraph:
> > 
> > It is intended for use with NICs - if you want to do NAT on a
> > PPP link, use the -nat switch to ppp(8).
> > 
> > <mike
> > --
> Mike, I would disagree, as my system here is quiet happily running
> ppp and natd /ipfw. I know the natd man page says NO, but their
> are a few FAQ's on the web that show how it is done. IIRC the FAQ
> I used is on www.freebsddiary.org
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kat.
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?015401c09e13$f0acd640$fe00a8c0>