Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Aug 1998 03:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org>
To:        Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        ac199@hwcn.org, vanilla@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: manpages (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/p5-Term-Query p5-Term-Query-2.0.tgz)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980824024546.1308C-100000@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <199808240608.XAA02385@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote:

> ===
> .for sect in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
> .if exists(${PKGDIR}/MAN${sect})
> MAN${sect}+=	${CAT} ${PKGDIR}/MAN${sect}
> .endif
> .endfor
> ===

It sure seems like a good idea to me.  My one worry is that this
would make more work for Steve, vanilla, mph, or one of the
committers who dedicate countless hours to testing and closing
the various PRs that submit updates to ports...?

Other than that, it sure would make some Makefiles look a lot
nicer...

The other possibility is just to let Makefiles use a
``.include "pkg/MEN"''.

[Of course, a guideline such as "don't use this for less than XX
 manpages" should be made.]


> +# NO_WRKDIR		- There's no work directory at all; port does this someplace
> +#				  else.

Obviously still there...


>  ARCH!=	uname -m
> @@ -352,8 +454,23 @@
>  PKGDIR?=		${.CURDIR}/pkg
[Many more lines elided]

Somehow you've changed what was originally a simple change into
something pretty large...  :)

Since so much is changing anyways...  Is it worthwhile changing a
few non-absolute paths to absolute ones?  I'm not sure what the
original reason for using absolute paths was, but if it was
good...  :)

My cursory scroll-through finds naked pkg_delete, expr, and of
course, many many [.  I assume the last one was intentional due
to the fact that even using the short variable form "$[" doubles
its length.  :) 

There's also a naked ldconfig on line ~1751.

[Hehe.  I'm tempted to suggest an INSTALLS_SHLIBS variable, now,
 but that probably should wait untill after E-day, at least :-]


-- 
This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980824024546.1308C-100000>