Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Jan 2015 22:35:57 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        Benjamin Kaduk <bjkfbsd@gmail.com>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper <ngie@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r276565 - in head/gnu: lib/libstdc++/doc usr.bin/diff usr.bin/diff/doc usr.bin/gdb usr.bin/gperf usr.bin/gperf/doc
Message-ID:  <20150102213557.GE288@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150102213341.GA72376@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <201501022034.t02KYu1I030453@svn.freebsd.org> <20150102204458.GA72199@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAJ5_RoDiKnFbDeXsUPdmC2w_i5F1dmjBw9gSZ3tRu=c9wAQKvA@mail.gmail.com> <20150102213341.GA72376@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:33:41PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steve Kargl <
> > sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >=20
> > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 08:34:56PM +0000, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > > > Author: ngie
> > > > Date: Fri Jan  2 20:34:55 2015
> > > > New Revision: 276565
> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/276565
> > > >
> > > > Log:
> > > >   Remove gnu/ info pages to unbreak the build with MK_GCC !=3D no, =
etc
> > > >
> > >
> > > Does this mean that FreeBSD is now shipping utilities without
> > > documentation?
> > >
> >=20
> > I'm pretty sure we've been doing that for a long, long time.
> >=20
> > Note that MK_GCC=3Dno is the default on head for the tier-1 platforms.
> >=20
>=20
> Yeah, I know what the default is for tier-1, which is somewhat
> irrelevant to my question.  bapt@ has removed info pages (and
> Garrett seems to have cleanup after bapt).  Noting that FreeBSD
> has more than just tier-1, the question remains.  Is FreeBSD
> now shipping utilities without proper documentation?
>=20
The man pages remains, for binutils for examples, the manpages were generat=
ed
out of the texinfo files meaning the manpage contains the same amount of
informations

Bapt

--jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlSnDz0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyFUgCfY46hUYG9+JZ2ZNTTCwybrzhq
0FQAnjBepgebXyn/9/VjfQMToctQJGiU
=S31U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150102213557.GE288>