Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 07:10:23 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matt Smith <fbsd@xtaz.co.uk> Subject: Re: gnupg & pinentry Message-ID: <905f9b0e84ac19dff7be71a9f040fc40@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412241222240.90549@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <CAJuc1zPtDsOQG2oAKoTVB%2BpVyox8h1mGZOW6CtMBw1GN7=vnOg@mail.gmail.com> <20141222094630.GF52267@xtaz.uk> <1419342257.1161578.206107753.2999EC08@webmail.messagingengine.com>, <20141223135111.GA45509@xtaz.uk> <c3a98cd3db28250390c46275862214ea@ultimatedns.net>, <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412241222240.90549@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:23:38 +0300 (MSK) Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
wrote
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Chris H wrote:
>
> > > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> > > >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the
> > > >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entry option.
> > > >
> > > >Anyone up for a weekend challenge? :-)
> > >
> > > There has been another thread on this mailing list discussing making the
> > > port honour the WITHOUT_X11 and OPTIONS_UNSET+=X11 options from
> > > make.conf which would make it only depend on security/pinentry-curses
> > > instead of security/pinentry. This seems like a good solution to me. It
> > > would mean if one of those options is set it will only drag in a single
> > > dependancy rather than all the X11 libraries and GTK.
> > A quick look @ the security/pinentry Makefile, indicates that the
> > request for this type of modification is trivial. It simply requires
> > reversing the (PORT_)OPTIONS logic -- this port could completed in
> > under 5 minutes. So unless instructed otherwise, I'll go ahead with
> > this.
> > One last question; pinentry-console, or pinentry-nox?
>
> already defined: pinentry-curses ;)
Right you are, Dmitry. :)
>
> (see side thread)
>
> Patch I snet previoursy is syntax incorrect, the following seems to be more
> useful:
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- Makefile (revision 375271)
> +++ Makefile (working copy)
> @@ -22,7 +22,11 @@
> libksba.so:${PORTSDIR}/security/libksba \
> libnpth.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/npth
> BUILD_DEPENDS= libgpg-error>=1.11:${PORTSDIR}/security/libgpg-error
> +.if defined(WITHOUT_X11) || !empty(OPTIONS_UNSET:MX11)
> +RUN_DEPENDS= pinentry>0:${PORTSDIR}/security/pinentry-curses
> +.else
> RUN_DEPENDS= pinentry>0:${PORTSDIR}/security/pinentry
> +.endif
>
> GNU_CONFIGURE= YES
> USES= gmake iconv tar:bzip2
Yes, I had a closer look at the code last night, and the only
possible addition I could find. Was possibly adding:
--disable-fallback-curses
to the -ncurses slave port. But in the end, what would be gained?
I think your patch above does it all.
Thanks for your time, and consideration, Dmitry, and
have a Merry Christmas!
--Chris
>
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
> [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?905f9b0e84ac19dff7be71a9f040fc40>