Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:05:22 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, Gnu_Raiz <gnu.raiz@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Z00Q Problem Tyan MB! Message-ID: <43AC2E52.8000304@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20051222020349.GA16607@poupinou.org> References: <c740cf110512211223s4b7d7c59n387b1dfedd62567b@mail.gmail.com> <20051222020349.GA16607@poupinou.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruno Ducrot wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:23:56PM -0600, Gnu_Raiz wrote: > >>Hi: developers, fellow users! >> >>After reading the manual, and trying different things to get the acpi error >>message's from showing up in boot output. I have come to you for help in >>solving this problem. >> >>After doing a google search it seems that Tyan has a problem with their MB's >>and especially their acpi regarding the Z00Q errors. It seems that many >>people have the error's I have, but after reading up on the threads, I have >>not seen a solution posted. I have seen a few people give up, but no >>solutions. I am using a Tyan Tiger MP 2460 motherboard with 2 mp 1.2 chips, >>with an smp kernel. So far I don't think that these errors are fatal, as >>others have mentioned, it just looks bad. >> >>I am running FreeBSD Raiz_mpx.midsouth.rr.com 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD >>6.0-RELEASE #2: Sun Dec 18 17:44:34 CST 2005 >>rcall@Raiz_mpx.midsouth.rr.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MPXSMPKERNEL >>i386 >> >>Here is the sysctl hw.acpi information. >>------- >>hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S1 S4 S5 >>hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 >>hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1 >>hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE >>hw.acpi.standby_state: S1 >>hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3 >>hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 1 >>hw.acpi.s4bios: 0 >>hw.acpi.verbose: 1 >>hw.acpi.reset_video: 1 >>hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 >>hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 >>hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% >>--------- >> >>Here is the sample boot -v with acpi enabled. Of course this goes on for >>like 20 lines, If you really need all of dmesg then I would be happy to post >>the rest. >>--------- >>in ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [Z00Q] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND >>SearchNode 0xc2251d40 StartNode 0xc2251d40 ReturnNode 0 >> ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed >>[\\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.SIO_.COM2._S >>TA] (Node 0xc229d0a0), AE_NOT_FOUND >> ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [Z00Q] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND >> ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed >>[\\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.SIO_.COM1._S >>--------- > > > A real first read of your report would suggest that something is broken > in your bios for detecting serial ports. > > >>If I boot with acpi disabled, I get pnp errors on one of my device's, so I >>really need to use acpi even with the error messages. I have looked in the >>bios for different options to turn on and off, but with no success. When I >>compile my .asl file I get these results. >>------------ >>Raiz_mpx# iasl rcall-TyanMP2460.asl >> >>Intel ACPI Component Architecture >>ASL Optimizing Compiler / AML Disassembler version 20041119 [Nov 3 2005] >>Copyright (C) 2000 - 2004 Intel Corporation >>Supports ACPI Specification Revision 2.0c >> >>rcall-TyanMP2460.asl 1553: Store (Z00Q, Local0) >>Error 1022 - Object does not exist ^ (Z00Q) >> >>rcall-TyanMP2460.asl 1659: Store (Z00Q, Local0) >>Error 1022 - Object does not exist ^ (Z00Q) >> >>rcall-TyanMP2460.asl 1891: Store (Z00Q, Local0) >>Error 1022 - Object does not exist ^ (Z00Q) >> >>rcall-TyanMP2460.asl 2386: Method (_WAK, 1, NotSerialized) >>Warning 2026 - ^ Reserved method must return a >>value (_WAK) >> >>ASL Input: rcall-TyanMP2460.asl - 2401 lines, 77770 bytes, 827 keywords >>Compilation complete. 3 Errors, 1 Warnings, 0 Remarks, 320 Optimizations >>Raiz_mpx# >>------------ >> >>I have looked in my .asl file but I am at a loss for what to look for, or >>how to solve my problem. I do code a little bit and going to the error lines >>I find this. >>I put in the (---->) to point to the line that the error code is in. >> >> >>Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) >> { >> Store (Z00Q, Local0) >>(--->) And (Local0, 0x02, Local0) >> If (LEqual (Local0, 0x02)) >> { >> Return (0x00) >> } >> Else >> { >> Return (STA (0x03)) >> } >> } >> >> Name (_PRS, ResourceTemplate () >> >> Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) >> { >> (---->) Store (Z00Q, Local0) >> And (Local0, 0x02, Local0) >> If (LEqual (Local0, 0x02)) >> { >> Return (0x00) >> } >> Else >> >>Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) >> { >>(---->) Store (Z00Q, Local0) >> And (Local0, 0x04, Local0) >> If (LEqual (Local0, 0x04)) >> { >> Return (0x00) >> } >> Else >> { >> Return (STA (0x01)) > > > I can't tell much on that if I have not access to the ASL. You can work around this problem with info from PR kern/89879 http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/acer_ferrari/ A future acpica import may address this problem. The aml is accessing a field before it's defined. The newest acpica adds support for lazy evaluation (even though this is out of spec). -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43AC2E52.8000304>