Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:24:17 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Logo Contest Message-ID: <420B6081.30206@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <1054192109.20050210101652@wanadoo.fr> References: <200502091349.00708.algould@datawok.com> <420ACD5E.3030708@pacific.net.sg> <200502092210.39490.algould@datawok.com> <420AE14F.6050104@pacific.net.sg> <1054192109.20050210101652@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Erich Dollansky writes: > > >>Do above attributes apply to the logo of the most successful software >>package known as Windows? > > > Yes. The Windows logo is simple and easy to recognize. The full logo > is in multiple colors and requires screens to print, which is a bit of a > drawback, but fortunately it is designed such that it can be printed > with fewer colors, no screens, and in monochrome if necessary. It > provides a very high level of brand recognition; even in straight black > and white, people instantly recognize what the logo represents. > And FreeBSD's beastie can even be 'printed' on an ASCII-Terminal still being recognised. > >>FreeBSD already has this image. > > > FreeBSD doesn't have a _logo_. > FreeBSD uses currently the multirole beastie. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420B6081.30206>