Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:25:16 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: portability sanity check Message-ID: <20010221102516.B93525@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <200102211553.f1LFrvs07412@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 08:53:57AM -0700 References: <20010221094228.A93221@hamlet.nectar.com> <200102211553.f1LFrvs07412@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > The standard requires that (void *) &foo == (void *) &foo->s Thanks, that is what I was trying to track down but couldn't find it. I also thought that perhaps a structure has the same requirement alignments as its first member ... I think that means the same thing as you've stated. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010221102516.B93525>