Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:46:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: mbr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/57727: repocopy request for OpenOffice.org Message-ID: <20031025104353.G64241@cvs.imp.ch> In-Reply-To: <20031025012016.GU96543@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200310250110.h9P1A3go078418@freefall.freebsd.org> <20031025012016.GU96543@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > Martin Blapp submitted the original request to portmgr for a repocopy > from editors/openoffice -> editors/openoffice-1.0. > > To maintain accountability, I'm going to defer to Martin's opinion on > this unless I get explicit instruction to allow others to modify his > request. > > Martin? What are your thoughts? Since we still need openoffice devel, it's better to keep it. But I prefer that we don't use -stable after the ports name. I better like Move openoffice -> openoffice-1.0 Copy openoffice-devel -> openoffice-1.1 So we'll have then three different ports. Maho is this ok for you ? openoffice-1.0 openoffice-1.1 openoffice-devel Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031025104353.G64241>