Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:48:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Cc: adamw@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/57727: repocopy request for OpenOffice.org Message-ID: <20031025104740.A64241@cvs.imp.ch> In-Reply-To: <20031025.110850.596529566.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> References: <200310250110.h9P1A3go078418@freefall.freebsd.org> <20031025.110850.596529566.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > repocopy openoffice-1.1-stable or openoffice-1.1 (omitting stable is better?) > make openoffice-2.0-devel > is better. Yes omitting stable is better. And I like the idea of openoffice-2.0-devel. Can we Move openoffice-devel to openoffice-2.0-deve ? > Some requests to create localized build for OOo 1.1, > I want to create slave ports as well, and > since 1.1 is released, and ports are avaiable, repo copying > openoffice-devel to openoffice-1.1 or something is very natural. > even 2.0 codeline is available at the moment... > > Martin, are you extremely busy? Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031025104740.A64241>