Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 01:37:57 -0700 From: Josh MacDonald <jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNU binutils port Message-ID: <199604240837.BAA19783@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Apr 1996 16:52:14 %2B1000." <199604120652.QAA00548@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > They are only warnings and many would go away if less warnings were enabled. > There would be many more if more were enabled. For the LINT kernel built on > Apr 6, the warning counts were: > > compiler warnings (lines) > -------- -------- > cc 74 > cc -Wall 2394 > gcc-2.7.2 4694 > Oh dear.... I can't beleive you're saying this, "They are only warnings". To me, it has, "My code sucks and I don't care." written all over it if you don't fix things so that they compile with no warnings and -Wall. Perhaps kernel code is a bit different, but with 4700 warnings, I'd be little scared. > Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604240837.BAA19783>