Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:31:59 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, rodolfo@ravel.ufrj.br, hubs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-maintainers@wcarchive.cdrom.com, dg@root.com Subject: Re: Proposed reorganization of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD Message-ID: <199901131831.KAA14584@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan,
What happened to this one? I'd like to ship a bsd.port.mk with the
new locations with 3.1.
Or should I just go ahead and reorganize the ports/package trees?
Satoshi
-------
I wrote:
* ports/
* index.html
* distfiles/
* distfiles-3.0.1/ (distfiles for 3.0.1 ports)
* packages-2.2.7/
* packages-2.2.8/
* packages-3.0/
* packages-3.0.1/
* packages-current/
* packages-stable/
* ports/ ("cvs co ports")
* ports-2.2.7/ (extracted version of 2.2.7/ports)
* ports-2.2.8/ (etc.)
* ports-3.0/
* ports-3.0.1/
* ports-current -> ports
* ports-stable -> ports
Maybe we should move the packages/ dir one level down. I forgot about
alpha packages (which could start arriving any time soon).
How about:
ports/
index.html
distfiles/
distfiles-3.0.1/ (distfiles for 3.0.1 ports)
alpha/
packages-3.0.1/
packages-current/
i386/
packages-2.2.7/
packages-2.2.8/
packages-3.0/
packages-3.0.1/
packages-current/
packages-stable/
packages -> i386/packages-current
ports/ ("cvs co ports")
ports-2.2.7/ (extracted version of 2.2.7/ports)
ports-2.2.8/ (etc.)
ports-3.0/
ports-3.0.1/
ports-current -> ports
ports-stable -> ports
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901131831.KAA14584>