Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:13:13 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports vs packages Message-ID: <4F0B3C49.3060506@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <CAM-i3igvcs-oY5M1berGBHBeQdeLKnq4Ngw6q04yuqKUvQnQ5g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJxePN%2BWrr6K83RGFGERzJGUXc24i95BemPOgxqAJW_2Lsfjpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM-i3igvcs-oY5M1berGBHBeQdeLKnq4Ngw6q04yuqKUvQnQ5g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/9/12 6:48 PM, claudiu vasadi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, alexus <alexus@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ports vs Packages? >> >> /usr/ports vs pkg_* >> >> pros/cons >> >> -- >> http://alexus.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > you google-ing vs you google-ing > > pro/cons ? > Now posting in a legendary thread. Also, http://fail.my.gd/legendary_thread.jpg Although, I have to say your reply is a bit blunt ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F0B3C49.3060506>