Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 14:05:17 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@earthlink.net> To: Bill Schoolcraft <bill@wiliweld.com> Cc: Josef Grosch <jgrosch@mooseriver.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "No tun0 ?" Message-ID: <20010707140517.F408@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107071133430.17134-100000@corten2.billschoolcraft.com>; from bill@wiliweld.com on Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:20:42PM -0700 References: <20010707111532.A63756@mooseriver.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107071133430.17134-100000@corten2.billschoolcraft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:20:42PM -0700, Bill Schoolcraft wrote: [snip] > Thanks Joe, > > Yes all the above are located but I'm having some other issues that > have never happened with FreeBSD. > > I can ping all my nameservers by IP, have the same stanza's in > /etc/resolv.conf as I've used for years, but the new 4.2 box refuses > to resolv by name. > > If I add the IP/name in /etc/hosts then of course I can ping by > name. > > I went into /etc/host.conf and commented out the [host] line and > then cannot ping anything. > > Does the new IPFW options in the kernel blow away something that > used to work by default ? New IPFW options? I can't think of any IPFIREWALL kernel options that have changed since 3.x... or 2.2.x for that matter. OTOH, if you have enabled ipfw(8) in your kernel you will need to enter some rules to let DNS traffic through. Do things work if you run with the "open" firewall? -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010707140517.F408>