Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:04:09 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: a proposed callout API
Message-ID:  <456CC069.3040107@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <456CBE20.4010902@elischer.org>
References:  <7105.1163451221@critter.freebsd.dk>	<200611281631.19224.jhb@freebsd.org> <456CBE20.4010902@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:


> I've mentionned several times that I think making both the spinlock and 
> Mutex code use the same mutex structure is a problem because one cannot 
> do any run-time checking to ensure that the correct call is being used..

s/run-time/compile-time/


> one must instead do runtime checking which is slower and may not hit all 
> unusual cases (except in unusual circumstances).
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?456CC069.3040107>