Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 17:45:30 -0700 From: "Wil Hatfield" <freebsd@hyperconx.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Partitioning on existing system Message-ID: <NGBBKBOMKLFOJCCDHPEOEEDNPPAA.freebsd@hyperconx.com> In-Reply-To: <44wtdyipuy.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> "tmpmfs" and related variables in rc.conf(5).
> By default it does a memory-backed disk instead of file-backed, but
> that can be adjusted.
>
> Personally, I find memory-backed /tmp to be more useful anyway.
tmpmfs="YES"
tmpsize="100m"
tmpmfs_flags="-S -M -o noexec,nosuid"
Is there something wrong with this because it isn't creating a /tmp at all.
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #4: Mon Apr 3 22:25:51 PDT 2006
--
Wil Hatfield
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NGBBKBOMKLFOJCCDHPEOEEDNPPAA.freebsd>