Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 02:19:38 +0200 (EET) From: petre@kgb.ro To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: "Native" journaling file systems? Message-ID: <1263.193.231.237.171.1135037978.squirrel@dummy-host.example.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On 2005-12-19 10:28, Justin Smith <jsmith@drexel.edu> wrote: > Are there any plans to develop UFS3--- i.e., a UFS2 file system with an > added journal? >Not sure. > I've used several journaling file systems in Linux and like the Reiser > FS except for one MAJOR drawback: When something goes wrong, reiser-fsck > absolutely sucks at repairing things (Hans Reiser freely admits that but > says it's never needed because nothing ever goes wrong). hmmm, reiserfsck --rebuild-tree solved my problems twice; or was it pure luck ? ;) >Which is, FYI, absolutely and plainly bullshit. I've seen Linux machines >with Reiserfs die and cause major pains for dozens of people. Hans may be >a smart guy and a very successful businessman, but this particular >statement is utter nonsense and I have the scars to prove it. > A UFS3 might have the same desirable features. >I can't help with the answer to this :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1263.193.231.237.171.1135037978.squirrel>