Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:30:14 +0700 (NOVST)
From:      "Rashid N. Achilov" <shelton@sentry.granch.ru>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909171228210.39902-100000@sentry.granch.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990916185341.00aaf100@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Brett Glass wrote:

> At 04:14 PM 9/16/99 -0700, Liam Slusser wrote:
> 
> >Right...but if the system was hacked what would stop the hacker from
> >building BPF in a kernel?
> 
> securelevel=2 or securelevel=3.
> 
> Or Tripwire.

What's different between securelevel=1, securelevel=2 and securelevel=3?

   With Best Regards.
   Rashid N. Achilov (RNA1-RIPE), Cert. ID: 28514, Granch Ltd. lead engineer
   e-mail: achilov@granch.ru, tel (383-2) 24-2363



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909171228210.39902-100000>