Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:34:18 +0100 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@rktmb.org> Cc: freebsd Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html Message-ID: <4E5CF4EA.2070804@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E5CF417.5080503@rktmb.org> References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org> <4E5CB49F.50806@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5CBC14.4080908@rktmb.org> <4E5CF1ED.2030504@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5CF417.5080503@rktmb.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30/08/2011 15:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > For a _comparison_, I think it's up to somewhere else: > To really compare, it's mandatory to really now the multiple compared > items. Who cares about the latest MS Windows internals (deep > networking capability, filesystem tricks, kernel scheduler specs,...) > in here? > > I migh be wrong, but IMHO "core devs" and "power users" wont spend > time to deeply investigate on the other systems. You're wrong :) I write Windows drivers for a living, so I care about that stuff. -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5CF4EA.2070804>