Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 16:36:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@korin.warman.org.pl>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP hardware recommendations Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970505161634.12683I-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.970505160445.29377E-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You must mean very low density. If they were high density parts, there > would be less chips. I abused the terminology there. I was thinking how "densely packed" the chips appeared to be on the module, whereas the bit-density is comparatively low versus modules of the same capacity implemented with fewer chips as you point out. Thanks for setting me straight! > Personally, I find SIMMs with high chip counts to be highly suspect. I am arriving at the same conclusion :( -Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970505161634.12683I-100000>