Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 13:41:15 +0300 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: libxcb message - is it still relevant Message-ID: <AANLkTik9QWWpfXamvkp6yQA8GhoyQ639G7Lcfdv2vOHA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As far as I could tell xcb is currently the default Xlib. Is the following message that libXcb is experimental still true? ***************************************************************** Although libxcb can yield dramatic improvements in speed, memory footprint, and responsiveness, and will probably become the default Xlib for X.org/freedesktop.org, it is still experimental software. Some broken callers will abort() on locking assertion failures. As a temporary workaround, set LIBXCB_ALLOW_SLOPPY_LOCK in your environment to skip the abort(). This may result in noisy stacktrace printing. *****************************************************************
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTik9QWWpfXamvkp6yQA8GhoyQ639G7Lcfdv2vOHA>