Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:30:21 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa <root@pukruppa.de> Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>, Ozone <ozone@theshop.net>, freebsd-question@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Gnome or lack of.[extended] Message-ID: <20020406103021.GA10035@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <20020406083141.T21276-100000@small.pukruppa.de> References: <1018057738.17538.82.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020406083141.T21276-100000@small.pukruppa.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat 2002-04-06 (08:37), Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > On 5 Apr 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 20:45, Ozone wrote: > > > I do not have the space or bandwidth to utilize any gnome on my machine. And > > > I have noticed that the ports have a love affair with gnome. Is there any > > > command or entry for /etc/make.conf i.e. "WANT_GNOME=NO" that would over > > > ride the ports Makefile. Or am I stuck hand editing every Makefile. > > > > As long as you define WITHOUT_GNOME=yes in /etc/make.conf, you should be > > set. If you don't define that, and the port defines WANT_GNOME, the > > existence of /usr/X11R6/bin/gnome-config will be checked. If it exists, > > HAVE_GNOME will be set. > Is there some general principle how to exclude some package or > port? Like: > WITHOUT_EMACS=yes > WITHOUT_COMMUNICATOR4=yes No. But those are unlikely to be an optional library/dependency in many port builds. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020406103021.GA10035>