Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:14:00 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Adriaan de Groot <groot@kde.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? Message-ID: <1118434440.7847.5.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> <20050610092126.L32309@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-hOWm2LlmZwCz8qZVzWmI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adriaan de Groot p=ED=B9e v p=E1 10. 06. 2005 v 22:01 +0200: > On Friday 10 June 2005 15:22, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Oleg Rusanov wrote: > > > What kind of MotherBoard for Amd64 OPteron 252 or 264 processors is > > > better for FreeBsd and linux? > > > > Did you check http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html = for > > input? >=20 > I think the motherboards list could use a redesign so that it carries _mo= re_=20 > information. Right now one man's "Fully Functional" is another man's "Use= less=20 > Junk" because there's not enough detail on the page to decide what's goin= g=20 > on. That's what Notes field is for. > Case in point: I just got an Asus A8N-SLI (an accident on the fscking=20 > university administration where my order for an A8V goes through 6 layers= of=20 > clueless bureaucracy to get to the store -- I guess there was some Greek=20 > interpretation somewhere along the line) which is nForce4 based. Now, for= =20 > 5-stable users, you get: >=20 > 1) Won't boot 5.3-R amd64 > 2) In 5.3-R i386, is missing SATA RAID ('cause it's a Sil3114 which isn't= =20 > supported on any platform as RAID, but does manage to squeak by as a regu= lar=20 > SATA controller) and missing the onboard NIC (since nve is 6-CURRENT) >=20 > Unfortunately I didn't have my 5.4-R CDs with me to try it with either. S= till,=20 > this board is listed as "fully functional" on the motherboards page, whil= e it=20 > clearly isn't. Maybe for the original reporter who wants neither SATA RAI= D=20 > nor networking it's fine. There were a huge progress between 5.3-RELEASE and 5.4-RELEASE, and submitter claims his results with post-5.4 -STABLE. I will happily update the entry if you can provide feedback based on last release, ie. 5.4-RELEASE. 5.3-RELEASE just don't cut it anymore, sorry. --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you. --=-hOWm2LlmZwCz8qZVzWmI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCqfSIntdYP8FOsoIRAmyJAJ9g+lkuA6L9xMGdVXJnOkyuOsNJ4QCgscWI Gvv5VLHQTwPwtuZXo5jwtSc= =47l6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hOWm2LlmZwCz8qZVzWmI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1118434440.7847.5.camel>