Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Nov 1998 17:57:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
To:        mike@smith.net.au
Cc:        mike@smith.net.au, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: build machines (Re: Who built XFree86 with Kerberos?)
Message-ID:  <199811110157.RAA13068@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199811110006.QAA01634@dingo.cdrom.com> (message from Mike Smith on Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:06:45 -0800)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * No, not all of them have been solved.  However many of them have, and
 * it's worth at least *attempting* to deploy a subsystem we expect our
 * customers to use.  If it backfires, and we can't resolve the issue, 
 * then we can redistribute things.  In the interim, I think this is worth 
 * trying.

I don't think we have time for that.  The release of 2.2.8 is due at
the end of this month.  Also, NFS means a huge slowdown of individual
builds.  It's ok for things like distfiles and packages, but not for
the interim work directories or chroot /usr/local.

I agree that we should at least try it, but I'm also really strapped
of space on paddock right now and I'm spending a lot of time I can't
afford to waste.  How about you add one more 9GB drive to paddock and
the rest to bento?

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811110157.RAA13068>