Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:18:59 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lock annotations: enable them for libpthread, libstdthreads Message-ID: <20140828171859.GA81757@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJOYFBBbzu9ouwfUk1%2B1MLW0B2y%2B5JTD9-b0%2BkiymOT=xKU0uQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJOYFBBbzu9ouwfUk1%2B1MLW0B2y%2B5JTD9-b0%2BkiymOT=xKU0uQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:02:55PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > small number of patches to build with this flag, I am also going to > add -Wthread-safety to WARNS=6, to make sure it won't regress. I'm > also planning on MFC'ing at least the changes to <sys/cdefs.h>, so it > is at least possible to write portable code. What it is the performance penalty (time and memory)? That is, buildworld already takes a looooonnnnng time on my system because of clang. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140828171859.GA81757>