Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 05:37:59 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: script(2) [was: [CFT/review] new sendfile(2)] Message-ID: <4204.1409549879@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <5403B13C.60008@freebsd.org> References: <20140529102054.GX50679@FreeBSD.org> <20140729232404.GF43962@funkthat.com> <20140831165022.GE7693@FreeBSD.org> <540382E2.3040004@freebsd.org> <2770.1409522711@critter.freebsd.dk> <5403B13C.60008@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <5403B13C.60008@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >Lua at the syscall level makes sense. :) I doubt it. We're looking at high performance stuff and we don't want a silly parser and string processing involved. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4204.1409549879>