Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:46:30 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Jake Burkholder <jburkhol@home.com>, Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP Re: cvs commit: ... Change to queue(3) Message-ID: <v04210101b551b25635d7@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20000523212529.2B19CBA69@io.yi.org> References: <20000523212529.2B19CBA69@io.yi.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2:25 PM -0700 5/23/00, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > jake 2000/05/23 13:41:02 PDT > > Log: > > Change the way that the queue(3) structures are declared; > > don't assume that the type argument to *_HEAD and *_ENTRY > > is a struct. > > > > Suggested by: phk > > Reviewed by: phk > > Approved by: mdodd > > > >HEADS UP > >Possible action required! > >Some drivers use headers from the installed system during the >kernel build, and a make world, or at least make includes, is >necessary before a new kernel can be built. > >LINT is affected by this. What is the advantage of this? You're going to have a queue of some things, and those things are not structs? What else would they be? unions? or is this so one can use typedef'ed structs? (I guess I should look at the change before asking, but it seems like such an odd change to make...and my gut reaction is that it is a change in the wrong direction) --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04210101b551b25635d7>